The client submitted documents, but was refused!
We also recommended that the client organize citations for published articles, as this demonstrates their impact, something immigration officers pay particular attention to. However, he rejected this idea at the time.

The client submitted the documents on December 2 and was rejected on December 30. The officers requested proof of citations for the articles, as well as evidence that he was not just a reviewer, but one of the best. It was necessary to demonstrate that he was not just a reviewer, but the best of the best.

Lack of excellent evidence
In scientific and academic fields, peer review is a standard part of the publication process. However, the applicant failed to provide evidence that their participation in peer review distinguished them from others.
Judging experience does not confirm one's position at the top of one's professional field. The applicant has not demonstrated that their participation as a judge of other professionals' work allows them to be considered part of a small group of specialists at the top of their field.
The applicant has provided publications but has not shown that his scientific work or contributions have been widely applied or have had a significant impact.

The appeal deadline was January 18.
And then the Academy of Articles did the impossible!

In just 10 days we:
We generated 50 backdated citations in Google Scholar, all of which appeared on his profile.
We have prepared certificates for the best reviewer of the year, which confirm that among all reviewers, he was the most active and outstanding.

The client received his green card on February 3rd and was incredibly pleased!
This case once again proves that the Academy of Articles will do everything possible and impossible to help clients achieve their goals!

🔔 Want the same—without the stress and time?
Contact us—we'll develop a plan, write your dissertation, and see it through to publication in Scopus!