{"id":22177,"date":"2026-01-26T15:51:03","date_gmt":"2026-01-26T13:51:03","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/a-articles.kz\/?p=22177"},"modified":"2026-04-03T18:57:30","modified_gmt":"2026-04-03T15:57:30","slug":"scopus-risk-list-13","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/a-articles.kz\/en\/scopus-risk-list-13\/","title":{"rendered":"Journals That Will Soon Lose Their Scopus Indexing, Part 13"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t

Hello, dear colleagues!<\/strong><\/p>

This is Vasily Malets<\/a> \u2014 director of the \u00abAcademy of Articles\u00bb and author of the analytical column<\/strong>
\u00abJournals That May Lose Their Scopus Indexing.\u00bb<\/strong><\/p>

Today marks the first issue of 2026, and it will be a landmark one.<\/strong>
This time, our list includes four journals and one fake case study that misled more than 1,000 scientists from around the world.<\/p>

In this episode, we'll take a look at:<\/strong><\/p>

\u2013 1 Q1 journal<\/strong>, which is already exhibiting dangerous editorial practices;
\u2013 2 Q4 journals<\/strong> operating under predatory\/commercial publication models;
\u2013 1 case of a fake website<\/strong> that misled more than 1,000<\/strong> scientists from around the world.<\/p>

Unfortunately, all the publications on today\u2019s list represent not isolated errors but entrenched predatory practices: mass publications without proper peer review, disregard for academic standards, and a focus not on science but on quick profits.<\/p>

It is precisely these types of magazines that most often lead to:<\/strong><\/p>